Search for: All records

Abstract Insects often harbour heritable symbionts that provide defence against specialized natural enemies, yet little is known about symbiont protection when hosts face simultaneous threats. In pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum), the facultative endosymbiontHamiltonella defensaconfers protection against the parasitoid,Aphidius ervi, andRegiella insecticolaprotects against aphid‐specific fungal pathogens, includingPandora neoaphidis. Here, we investigated whether these two common aphid symbionts protect against a specialized virusA. pisum virus(APV), and whether their antifungal and antiparasitoid services are impacted by APV infection. We found that APV imposed large fitness costs on symbiont‐free aphids and these costs were elevated in aphids also housingH. defensa. In contrast, APV titres were significantly reduced and costs to APV infection were largely eliminated in aphids withR. insecticola. To our knowledge,R. insecticolais the first aphid symbiont shown to protect against a viral pathogen, and only the second arthropod symbiont reported to do so. In contrast, APV infection did not impact the protective services of eitherR. insecticolaorH. defensa. To better understand APV biology, we produced five genomes and examined transmission routes. We found that moderate rates of vertical transmission, combined with horizontal transfer through food plants, were the major route of APV spread, although lateral transfer by parasitoids also occurred. Transmission was unaffected by facultative symbionts. In summary, the presence and species identity of facultative symbionts resulted in highly divergent outcomes for aphids infected with APV, while not impacting defensive services that target other enemies. These findings add to the diverse phenotypes conferred by aphid symbionts, and to the growing body of work highlighting extensive variation in symbiont‐mediated interactions.